药物评价研究杂志

期刊简介

  《药物评价研究》(双月刊)创刊于1978年,是由中国药学会和天津药物研究院共同主办的国家级药学科技学术性期刊,办刊宗旨:报道药物评价工作实践,推动药物评价方法研究,开展药物评价标准或技术探讨,促进药物评价与研究水平的提高,为广大药物研究人员提供交流平台.读者对象:药品管理、新药研发、药物临床应用、药学教育等相关的高等院校、科研院所、CRO组织、生产企业、药品管理与审评机构的研究人员、管理人员、临床医生和研究生等。

  《药物评价研究》杂志是为了适应时代发展的需要而创办的,随着国家对药品市场的监管力度的加大,新药的临床前和临床阶段评价,甚至已上市药物的再评价等的重要性均日益突显。但国内尚无药物评价方面的专门性杂志,相应的研究内容散在药学、中药学、药理学、临床医学等相关的杂志中。

亚太热带医药杂志(英文版)征稿启事

时间:2023-08-11 10:34:00

68.jpg

Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine《亚太热带医学杂志(英文版)》(月刊),创刊于2008年,由海南医学院主办、国际著名出版集团Elsevier(爱思唯尔)出版、发行,是目前中国唯一一本全英文版的国际性热带医药期刊(月刊)。


Instructions to Authors

A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine alone at that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review. Manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to the Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine readers are also liable to be rejected at this stage itself.

Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine are sent to two or more expert reviewers. During submission, the contributor is requested to provide names of two or three qualified reviewers who have had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript, but this is not mandatory. The reviewers should not be affiliated with the same institutes as the contributor/s. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the editor. The journal follows a double-blind review process, wherein the reviewers and authors are unaware of each other’s identity. Every manuscript is also assigned to a member of the editorial team, who based on the comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers’ comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript. This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.

Manuscripts received from Editorial Board members will be screened by the Executive Editor-in-Chief and sent to external peer reviewers. The editorial board members who are authors will be excluded from publication decisions.

Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within three days. It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online. To achieve faster and greater dissemination of knowledge and information, the journal publishes articles online as ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance.